Nashville Post
Front Page

Letter to Editor: Ethics Commission chief responds re NashvillePost.com analysis

12-14-2006 12:39 PM

To the Editor:

In response to your December 13th article entitled "Ethics Commission should live up to its name," I would like to respond.

The four-hour public meeting of the Tennessee Ethics Commission demonstrates the seriousness and dedication with which it takes its work. The issues debated involved significant interpretations of the law as evidenced by the large number of reporters, lobbyists, lawyers and members of the public in attendance. Quick discussions and decisions would belittle the importance of the Commission's work.

With regard to the article's concern that the Commission does not share its work with lobbyists, at the Commission's public meeting on October 31st, a draft advisory opinion concerning lawyers was first discussed. Following that public discussion (in which Mr. Ramsaur and other lobbyists were in attendance and allowed to comment), the Commission staff prepared a new draft of the opinion which was posted on the Commission's public website on November 27th and an e-mail was sent to Mr. Ramsaur and other lobbyists so notifying them. On December 4th, a Commissioner e-mailed proposed edits without comment to all Commissioners, but no discussion, deliberation or meeting of any kind took place among the Commissioners between the sending of the draft and the public meeting when the Commissioner's proposed edits were made available to the public prior to the meeting.  The draft was subsequently debated at the public meeting, at which time Mr. Ramsaur and other lobbyists were provided an opportunity to comment.

Since its beginning, the Commission has acted with openness and full compliance with the law. In fact, the Commission has repeatedly gone beyond the mandates of the law by posting draft opinions, agendas, and meeting minutes on its website prior to meetings and inviting interested parties like Mr. Ramsaur the opportunity to participate in meetings. I urge your readers and the public to monitor the Commission's website (www.tn.gov/sos/tec/) and attend our next public meeting, scheduled for February 15th, and come to their own conclusions about the seriousness and openness of the Commission.

Bruce A. Androphy
Executive Director
Tennessee Ethics Commission

See related articles:

RSS Allan F. Ramsaur | RSS The Law | RSS Bruce A. Androphy

dodds@conmergence.com States:

Posted on 12/14/2006 5:08 pm

We don't have to wait for the presentation of the synthesis of their work product in final format; they just need to post their study materials in a manner which lets folks comment upon them:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

They can publish the hardback later.

http://www.halfbakery.com/ and http://whynot.net already use this feedback model in the area of innovation. It is very similar to http://tnimc.org/ except that their format doesn't really allow for immediate reader feedback ( or sematic tagging of the type http://technorati.com/ and http://del.icio.us utilize ).

Scott McNealy of SUN was on CNBC.com yesterday a.m. touting this approach ( the wiki way ) to encourage global distributed K-12 education http://www.curriki.org/xwiki/bin/view/News/.

See also http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_23/b3886138.htm

and http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2061135,00.asp

There's all kinds of free open source software which can host this approach ( drupal, joomla, mediawiki, etc. -- just google wiki )

Then we can get on to them to publish the state budget in extensible business reporting language a la the SEC ( http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/xbrl.htm )

You must be logged in to comment. If you do not have an account, you can join our esteemed subscribers.